CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION: THE APRM PROCESS AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN BENIN
__________________________________________________________________________
same time, the APR Secretariat develops a background document on the
country. This document is drafted on the basis of documentary research and on
recent and relevant information about the state of governance and
development in the country. It covers the four focus areas.
6.
Phase Two is the country review visit. Under the direction of the APR Panel,
the CRM visits the country concerned. Its priority is to add to the CSAR by
holding as many consultations as possible with government, officials, political
parties, parliamentarians, representatives of civil society organisations, the
media, the academia, trade unions, business and professional bodies. Its main
objectives are to:
learn about the perspectives of the different stakeholders on governance in
the country;
clarify the challenges identified in the documents on issues not addressed
in the country’s preliminary programme of action; and
build consensus on how such issues could be addressed.
7.
It is important to note that the country plays a mainly facilitative role during
the visit to ensure that the CRM can carry out its review efficiently. The CRM
has full access to all sources of information and to the different stakeholders,
as is provided for in the MOU on the Technical Assessment Mission and on
the CRM signed by the country and the APRM.
8.
During Phase Three the report of the review mission is drafted. It is based on
the CSAR, the background documents, questions prepared by the APR
Secretariat, and on information obtained from both official and unofficial
sources during the wide-ranging consultations held with stakeholders during
the review visit.
9.
The draft report:
10.
34
considers the applicable political, economic, corporate governance and
socioeconomic development commitments made in the preliminary
programme of action;
identifies any remaining weaknesses; and
recommends further actions to be included in the final programme of
action.
The draft report is first examined by the panel, its official author. It should be
clear about the specific actions to be taken in cases where major issues have
been identified. The draft report is first discussed with the government
concerned to ensure the accuracy of its information. This, therefore, is an
opportunity for the government to react to the CRM’s findings and to
formulate its own views on the weaknesses that have been identified and
which must be corrected. The government’s responses should be appended to
the CRM’s report on its findings and the recommendations made in the draft