Article 126: "Any person who voluntarily causes disturbance to any assembly lawfully engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremony, is guilty of a misdemeanour". Article 128: "Any person who, with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of any other person, writes any words, or […], with the like intention utters any word or makes any sound […] or makes any gesture or places any object in the sight of any other person is guilty of misdemeanour and is liable to imprisonment for one year". • Right to receive information and to disseminate his opinions (Freedom of expression) Article 9 ACHPR. This is probably the most delicate and vulnerable right of those intended to be protected by either national and international laws and represents one of the key issues of the leading texts on Human Rights. It is enshrined, in Article 11 of the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen; in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 16 December 1966. The two inalienable components of this right: “freedom of opinion” and “freedom of information” are protected by the Constitution of Seychelles in its Article 22.1: "Every person has a right to freedom of expression and for the purpose of this article this right includes the freedom to hold opinions and to seek, received and impart ideas and information without interference". For a long time the basic issue raised by freedom of expression was attainment of the conditions most conducive to its full development. Nowadays, in the "pacified democracies", the issue tending to "make headlines" has concerned the relationship between freedom of expression and other rights whose protection might clashes with the full blooming of freedom of expression. We are therefore faced with a situation that is delicate but also rich. It reflects the complexity of reality: the unitary, monistic vision of legal systems must give way to a perception of competing, confrontational areas. This should make possible to adopt a holistic approach in which the various aspects are considered side by side to ascertain their concordances and also their contradictions. It is in the aim of searching for this balance that Article 22 in its