NEPAD/HSGIC-03-2003/APRM/Guideline/OSCI 9 March 2003 b. An effectively independent judicial services commission to ensure professionalism and integrity with responsibility for the appointment of judges. c. Inter-party committees within Parliament exercising effective oversight functions over various areas of public interest. d. Overall assessment of state of governance in these areas 2.7 Objective 5: Ensure accountable, efficient and effective public office holders and civil servants? 2.7.1 Standards a. The Conference of Security, Stability, Development and Cooperation (CSSDCA) Solemn Declaration (2000) b. NEPAD Framework Document 2.7.2 Indicative Criteria a. Are the provisions in the constitution and other laws and regulations effective in ensuring accountability of public office holders? b. Are the institutions, such as a public services commission, effectively structured and resourced to ensure professionalism and integrity in public service? c. Is there a code of conduct for public office holders or a citizens’ charter? d. What is the overall efficiency, effectiveness and transparency of delivery of service? 2.7.3 Examples of Indicators a. Mandated reports by the Executive branch of Government to the country b. Provisions for public hearings to which public officials can be called to account; Page 11 of 31