encouraging member states to use the reporting mechanisms to provide information on the situation of child rights in their countries. 6. Carrying out research and studies to help better understand the situation of child rights on the Continent. For example, the mapping of children on the move in Africa is an ongoing study being carried out currently. Samrawit went on to share recurring child rights issues in the EAC: • The need for harmonization of laws for example the minimum age of marriage, and criminal responsibility. • Violence against children such as: • Killings, maiming and sale of body parts of children with albinism. • Corporal punishment in the home and school setting • Child labor and the situation of street children • Sex tourism, child prostitution and sexual exploitation • Protection of refugee children. For example, Kenya hosts a large number of refugees including children • Trafficking in children • Access to high quality health care and education for all children • Harmful traditional practices that violate children’s rights • Radicalization of children into extremist groups 3.2. Plenary Discussion: During the consideration of the presentation and plenary discussion, the following were highlighted: a. Ayelaw explained that the ACERWC receives state party reports according to guidelines that covers each of the elements of the Charter. In addition, they also receive complimentary reports from CSOs. Most of the child rights issues and concerns raised can be explained by Government but when it cannot, they are explored further. While we are here to discuss challenges, it does not mean nothing good is happening in the region. For example, we know that the Kenyan Government is trying hard to address radicalization of children. In South Sudan, the ACERWC went on a mission to advocate for the ratification of the Charter. South Sudan has ratified the UNCRC so now we need to continue to push for the ratification of the ACC. b. A participant asked about whether recommendations to the States are binding and how the ACERWC follows up to ensure they are implemented. It was explained that when recommendations are made, there is follow up to see if have been followed. The state parties have to respond in 180 days about what they have done. If the Committee is satisfied, then no further action is taken; If not satisfied with the response, then the Committee may call upon parties to submit additional communication and call the state party to a hearing. The recommendations of the committee are not binding however and relies on the goodwill of states to implement. If states are not responding, they will report them to the Executive council for the AU to follow up further. Implementation of decisions is a challenge at all levels – if there is no will from the Government, then it is a challenge. The