for 48 hours without due process where he suspected that, such a person was likely to commit a breach of peace ·or disturb the public tranquillity. The courts of law and the public vo1ce intervened to condemn violations of the fundamental rights. In 1996, the Regional _Commissioners' Act of 1962 and the District Commissioners Act of 1962 were repealed and replaced by the Regional and Area Commissioners Act , Under the new Act, the Regional and District Commissioner do not have power to detain. The President as well under the Preventive Detention Act 1962 had powers to detain. From 1962 to 1985 any detention order by the President could not be challenged in courts of law, and this was the existing ouster clause in the Law. In 1985 the Preventive Detention Act, 1962 was amended by the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1985. The amendments left powers of the President to detain an individual but accorded rights to detainees to challenge the detention in the court of law, right to be given reasons f.or detention within 15 days after detention, and right ofthe detainee's name to be published in the official government gazette so that the public have knowledge about the detention. The amendment extended its application to Zanzibar. This new position of the Preventive Detention law was put to test in the case of Dadi Karim Nuru Mohamed Vs Republic (1999) Dar es Salaam Registry (Unreported). The detainee in this case had been detained prison on the strength of a detention order signed by the Vice President while exercising powers of the President of the United Republic of Tanzania who was outside the country. The order was challenged among other things, for failing to meet the conditions set in the Preventive Detention Act, 1962 as amended by the Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act Cap 361 of the RE of 2002. The law provides that, the detainee should be given detailed reasons for his or her detention within 15 days of the order and his name be gazetted in the official government gazette. In thi s case Lady Justice Kileo indicated that iL was improper fo r the executive 13

Select target paragraph3